Saint Louis University Law Journal | Vol 51 | No. 3

Skip to main content

If Roe Were Overruled: Abortion and the Constitution in a Post-Roe World (Spring 2007)

Volume 51, Number 3

Prefatory Matter

Table of Contents

Foreword

Foreword
Joel K. Goldstein

Childress Lecture

If Roe Were Overruled: Abortion and the Constitution in a Post-Roe World
Richard H. Fallon Jr.

Respondents

Gender, Abortion, and Travel After Roe’s End
Susan Frelich Appleton

State and Comparative Constitutional Law Perspectives on a Possible Post-Roe World
Stephen Gardbaum

Why Roe Won’t Go
Michael S. Greve

“Hard” or “Soft” Pluralism?: Positive, Normative, and Institutional Considerations of States’ Extraterritorial Powers
Mark D. Rosen

Stepping Out of Professor Fallon’s Puzzle Box: A Response to “If Roe Were Overruled”
Ann Althouse

Federalism Doctrines and Abortion Cases: A Response to Professor Fallon
Anthony J. Bellia Jr.

Fundamental Rights Versus Fundamental Wrongs: What Does the U.S. Constitution Say About State Regulation of Out-of-State Abortions?
Alan Howard

Comments

“In Accordance with General Principles of Comity”: President Bush’s Memorandum in Medellin v. Dretke and the Constitutional Limitations on the President’s Ability to Enforce the ICJ’s Avena Judgment at the State Level
Elizabeth A. Culhane

Depriving America of Evolving Its Own Standards of Decency?: An Analysis of the Use of Foreign Law in Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence and Its Effect on Democracy
David J. Pfeffer

Revisiting Tison v. Arizona: The Constitutionality of Imposing the Death Penalty on Defendants Who Did Not Kill or Intend to Kill
Melanie A. Renken