Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy
Document Type
Article
Abstract
The Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization was a pivotal moment that reshaped the landscape of abortion policy and delivery of abortion care in the United States. To create a space for critical reflection on the implications of Dobbs for the teaching and learning of abortion care in both medical and legal education, the authors engage in a dialogue highlighting the varied perspectives of professionals and professionals-in-training in both the medical and legal professions. As new attacks on reproductive autonomy continue at both state and federal levels, we foreshadow a tumultuous landscape for abortion policy in the next several decades and describe the impact and ramifications of widespread restrictions on abortion care at all levels of medical training and practice; collaboration between physicians and attorneys will be essential to forge a path ahead.
Recommended Citation
Michael S. Sinha, Anna Krotinger, Maya A. Phan & Louise P. King,
Reproductive Rights and Medico-Legal Education Post-Dobbs: A Fireside Chat,
17
St. Louis U. J. Health L. & Pol'y
(2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/jhlp/vol17/iss2/3