Files
Download Full Text (486 KB)
Description
Can blatant workplace discrimination escape the grasp of Title VII? In Chambers v. District of Columbia, the D.C. Circuit is considering whether to revisit a rule that employment discrimination must result in “objectively tangible harm” to give rise to a Title VII claim. In this article, the authors argue that the D.C. Circuit should stay true to the language and purpose of Title VII and adopt a standard similar to the simple “treated less well” test used under the NYC Human Rights Law.
Publication Date
12-13-2021
Document Type
Article
Keywords
Title VII, Chambers v. District of Columbia, Job Transfers
Disciplines
Labor and Employment Law | Law
Recommended Citation
Melzer, Andrew; Nadig, Alok; and Marum, Lindsay, "Chambers v. District of Columbia and the Future of Title VII" (2021). SLU Law Journal Online. 86.
https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lawjournalonline/86