Download

Download Full Text (504 KB)

Description

This Article argues that the current anxiety surrounding generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the legal academy is the latest iteration of a recurring historical cycle. By examining the introduction of other technological enhancements in the law, the author demonstrates that each technological shift was initially met with skepticism regarding the potential loss of critical thinking skills. However, history shows that these tools ultimately pushed the profession away from a focus on mechanical form and toward a deeper engagement with substantive analysis and strategic advocacy. Rather than posing an existential threat, AI represents a logical next step that can automate the generation of initial drafts, thereby allowing legal educators to elevate their pedagogical goals and focus on the higher-order skills that machines cannot replicate.

Publication Date

Spring 2026

Document Type

Article

Keywords

Technological Adaptation, Artificial Intelligence, Computer-assisted legal research (CALR), Legal education

Disciplines

Educational Technology | Law | Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility | Legal Writing and Research

SITUATING AI WITHIN THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGICAL ADAPTATION IN LAW

Share

COinS